Quindi, giochi GC su Virtual Console confermati.
Non è detto, anche perchè poi bisogna capire come gestire - ad esempio - l'assenza dei grilletti analogici.
GC classic controller incoming oppure sceglieranno la via degli HD remasters pure loro?
Oppure ancora si opterà per delle rivisitazioni più o meno importanti, stile New Play Control: se proprio roba "vecchia" deve essere, preferirei questa opzione.
le SH sono probabilmente preoccupate che WiiU sta vendendo troppo poco, eppure prima dell'uscita erano tutti lanciatissimi, tutti contenti nel volerci sviluppare sopra.
Francamente (EA esclusa, che in effetti aveva promesso eccome) tutti questi publisher che si strappavano le vesti e facevano a gara per supportare WiiU non so dove tu li abbia visti.
(non capirò mai come Nintendo investa i fantastiliardi fatti con Wii e DS, ma cazzo, comprati qualche studio e mettili a lavorare come schiavi)
Purtroppo (?) non è così semplice, sul versante acquisizioni Iwata ha ribadito più e più volte che ci vanno estremamente cauti (ora non ho sottomano il link ma ricordo bene di averne letto durante uno dei Q&A dei meeting con gli azionisti, se lo recupero lo posto dopo).
Poi si dovrebbe anche capire
chi acquisire... di team in grado di fare davvero la differenza & attualmente in vendita non è che ne veda in giro tantissimi.
EDIT: ho trovato un paio di quei quote di Iwata
http://www.nintendo.co.jp/ir/en/library/events/070427qa/index.htmlWhen we say we do not do M&A, there are always exceptions, so let me explain about it. We have never said that we will never do M&A in any situation. Actually, we are not against M&A if Nintendo can absorb the real value of the company. However, in most cases, the value of software developing companies is attached to its people, not the company, which is merely a vessel for its people. So, when we purchase a company, we can purchase the vessel, but we cannot necessarily purchase the contents. Even if we should compete with others to purchase a software company, although we might be able to increase the sheer number of our developers and to gain a short-term result, we do not think it will do good for us in the long run. We have been repeatedly saying that we will not do that kind of M&A.
In the case of Monolith Software, Mr. Sugiura, the president, and Nintendo have a long-term relationship. How Mr. Sugiura thinks is close to how Nintendo thinks. The software Mr. Sugiura would like to create is in line with what Nintendo would like to have for its platform. So, we thought that Nintendo should support this idea, and we decided to take action.
If certain conditions are met, we may do the same thing in the future (M&A). However, we will be very careful and selective, so that we will only partner with people with whom Nintendo can create a long-term working relationship.
Sometimes, some people say that Nintendo’s position will become even more solid if it purchased software companies by M&A, but I have no such intention because buying such companies will not contribute to strengthening Nintendo in the true sense. I believe that it is not the company but the skills of the employees that matters most, and therefore regard M&A as meaningless.
There are the cases where M&A is effective. For example, if a company holds a very important patent that Nintendo wants to obtain that will help fight future battles in the video games business with a huge advantage, that would be a time when Nintendo would consider the possibility of M&A. When we determine we should, we should not hesitate to work on the M&A at that time.
Once again, however, it shall be confined to the situation where owning a specific expertise or intellectual property right which belongs to the company will be critical. I do not think that rapidly increasing the number of people who cannot share Nintendo’s unique way of thinking or Nintendo DNA will do us any good. I have never thought that we should do an M&A just because, for example, we have recently not been able to make the significant sales growth. Neither do I have such intention in the future.
