Abbiamo metri di giudizio molto diversi, dunque.
Basta l'occhiello:
"undermine EU environment and health protection laws"
per continuare con
"deliberate attempts to change the EU democratic legislative process"
segue
"put corporations at the centre of policy-making, to the detriment of environment and public health"
poi
"“The effects of TTIP would be initially subtle but ultimately devastating. It would lead to European laws being judged on their consequences for trade and investment – disregarding environmental protection and public health concerns.”
E fin qui le opinioni. Poi ci sono i fatti, tecnici ma piuttosto comprensibili, ad esempio:
Long standing environmental protection is dropped
The “General Exceptions” rule, enshrined in the GATT agreement of the World Trade Organisation (WTO), is absent from the text. This nearly 70-year-old rule allows nations to restrict trade “to protect human, animal and plant life or health", or for "the conservation of exhaustible natural resources" [2].
e
"Precautionary principle is forgotten"
che chiunque conosca l'importanza del principio di precauzione non può non rabbrividire.
etc. Non vado avanti perché non ha senso, sto copincollando tutto l'articolo.
Fate un favore, leggetelo.
